Shuttl Alles, was du über unseren Service wissen musst.
Shuttle Inc. ist ein in Taiwan gegründetes Unternehmen, das Hauptplatinen und Design-Barebone-PCs im Small-Form-Factor-Format herstellt. Seit ist Shuttle Inc. eine börsennotierte Aktiengesellschaft. Der Hersteller unterteilt seine. Das Barebone ist die Basis für Ihren PC. Bei Shuttle sind Netzteil, Mainboard, Kabel und das spezielle Kühlsystem bereits in einem attraktiven Gehäuse. Für alle Produkte der Marke Shuttle gilt eine Gewährleistung von 2 Jahren; Fachhändler erhalten auf bestimmte Barebone-Produkte 3 Jahre Gewährleistung. Du teilst du dir das Shuttle und den Preis mit netten Menschen, die in eine ähnliche Richtung wollen. Aber keine Sorge, hierdurch kommt es nur zu minimalen. Ein Shuttle (auch Kanalfahrzeug oder Satellitenfahrzeug) ist ein Gerät zur automatischen Bedienung von Kanallagern. Anwendung im Kanallager[Bearbeiten.
See how we can help. Having trouble deploying reliable code? Not sure how to build in the cloud? Having frequent outages and not sure how to remediate them?
We help you answer the hard questions. We work with you to help develop a plan of action to transform your business and technology: Our first step is always sitting down with you and getting an over view of your current technology, listening to what your technology objective is, and then providing a road map on the strategies to get there.
We have years of experience building great products and transforming businesses. We understand that every business is unique. Every team has different ways of working.
We get it. We are not hear to disrupt your current efforts. We are here to help augment them. We have the knowledge and talent to deliver exceptional mobile experiences using Swift, Kotlin, or React Native.
We will work with you to determine exactly what you need to build and suggest the best platform for your needs. At some point in the Software Development Lifecycle, something that is providing you value starts costing more to maintain it.
We can help replace old technology with new applications without losing out completely taking out your legacy software. We believe that DevOps means that development teams own the Software Lifecycle, and that this enables high performing teams to release new features frequently, respond to outages quick, and ultimately providing a more efficient operation.
However, a strong foundation is still needed. We can provide that foundation. To fully take advantage of the Cloud, your workloads need to be designed for the Cloud.
Applying these new architectures can be difficult, we can help. Our focus is on AWS. We have the experience to securely manage and use the resources on Amazon Web Services.
We can provide the guidance and knowledge to make the most out of your cloud provider. With our experience delivering exceptional value through our high quality software.
We focus on deliverability and stability to ensure every application is easy to work with. The cloud has transformed the way we think about technologies and how to build software.
Following separation, they deployed drogue and main parachutes, landed in the ocean, and were recovered by the crews aboard the ships MV Freedom Star and MV Liberty Star.
The rocket motor, igniter, and nozzle were then shipped to Thiokol to be refurbished and reused on subsequent flights. The SRBs underwent several redesigns throughout the program's lifetime.
Subsequent flights until STS used cases that were 0. After the Challenger disaster as a result of a failed O-ring in cold temperature, the SRBs were redesigned to provide a constant seal regardless of the ambient temperature.
The Space Shuttle's operations were supported by vehicles and infrastructure that facilitated its transportation, construction, and crew access.
The orbiter vehicle was prepared at the Orbiter Processing Facility OPF and transferred to the VAB, where a crane was used to rotate it to the vertical orientation and mate it to the external tank.
Both tanks were slowly filled up until the launch as the oxygen and hydrogen evaporated. The launch commit criteria considered precipitation, temperatures, cloud cover, lightning forecast, wind, and humidity.
In addition to the weather at the launch site, conditions had to be acceptable at one of the Transatlantic Abort Landing sites and the SRB recovery area.
Failure to burn these gases could trip the onboard sensors and create the possibility of an overpressure and explosion of the vehicle during the firing phase.
The Space Shuttle continued its ascent using only the RS engines. The ET continued on a ballistic trajectory and broke up during reentry, with some small pieces landing in the Indian or Pacific Ocean.
Early missions used two firings of the OMS to achieve orbit; the first firing raised the apogee while the second circularized the orbit.
The type of mission that the Space Shuttle was assigned to dictated the type of orbit that it entered. The initial design of the reusable Space Shuttle envisioned an increasingly cheap launch platform to deploy commercial and government satellites.
Early missions routinely ferried satellites, which determined the type of orbit that the orbiter vehicle would enter. Following the Challenger disaster, many commercial payloads were moved to expendable commercial rockets, such as the Delta II.
Approximately four hours prior to deorbit, the crew began preparing the orbiter vehicle for reentry by closing the payload doors, radiating excess heat, and retracting the Ku-band antenna.
The orbiter vehicle maneuvered to an upside down, tail first orientation and began a minute OMS burn approximately 20 minutes before it reenter the atmosphere.
The orbiter vehicle's reentry was controlled by the GPCs, which followed a preset angle-of-attack plan to prevent unsafe heating of the TPS.
The GPCs also controlled the multiple aerobraking S-turns, using only the roll axis, to dissipate excess speed without changing the angle-of-attack.
Once the orbiter vehicle was traveling subsonically, the crew took over manual control of the flight. The speed brake was used to keep a continuous speed, and crew initiated a pre-flare maneuver to a A final flare maneuver reduced the orbiter vehicle's descent rate to 0.
After wheels stop, the crew deactivated the flight components and prepared to exit. In the event of unfavorable landing conditions, the Shuttle could delay its landing or land at an alternate location.
The primary alternate was Edwards AFB, which was used for 54 landings. In addition to the pre-planned landing airfields, there were 85 agreed-upon emergency landing sites to be used in different abort scenarios, with 58 located in other countries.
Additionally, as the orbiter vehicle only had UHF radios, international sites with only VHF radios would have been unable to communicate directly with the crew.
The facilities were prepared with equipment and personnel in the event of an emergency shuttle landing, but were never used. After the landing, ground crews approached the orbiter to conduct safety checks.
Teams wearing self-contained breathing gear tested for presence of hydrogen , hydrazine , monomethylhydrazine, nitrogen tetroxide , and ammonia to ensure the landing area was safe.
Once the orbiter was secured, it was towed to the OPF to be inspected, repaired, and prepared for the next mission.
During the design of the Space Shuttle, the Phase B proposals were not as cheap as the initial Phase A estimates indicated; Space Shuttle program manager Robert Thompson acknowledged that reducing cost-per-pound was not the primary objective of the further design phases, as other technical requirements could not be met with the reduced costs.
The disaster was caused by low-temperature impairment of an O-ring, a mission-critical seal used between segments of the SRB casing.
Failure of the O-ring allowed hot combustion gases to escape from between the booster sections and burn through the adjacent ET, leading to a sequence of events which caused the orbiter to disintegrate.
On February 1, , Columbia disintegrated during re-entry, killing all seven of the STS crew, because of damage to the carbon-carbon leading edge of the wing caused during launch.
Ground control engineers had made three separate requests for high-resolution images taken by the Department of Defense that would have provided an understanding of the extent of the damage, while NASA's chief TPS engineer requested that astronauts on board Columbia be allowed to leave the vehicle to inspect the damage.
NASA managers intervened to stop the Department of Defense's imaging of the orbiter and refused the request for the spacewalk,  : III—  and thus the feasibility of scenarios for astronaut repair or rescue by Atlantis were not considered by NASA management at the time.
The partial reusability of the Space Shuttle was one of the primary design requirements during its initial development. The actual costs of a Space Shuttle launch were higher than initial predictions, and the Space Shuttle did not fly the intended 24 missions per year as initially predicted by NASA.
NASA's pricing, which was below cost, was lower than expendable launch vehicles; the intention was that the high volume of Space Shuttle missions would compensate for early financial losses.
The improvement of expendable launch vehicles and the transition away from commercial payload on the Space Shuttle resulted in expendable launch vehicles becoming the primary deployment option for satellites.
The fatal Challenger and Columbia disasters demonstrated the safety risks of the Space Shuttle that could result in the loss of the crew. The spaceplane design of the orbiter limited the abort options, as the abort scenarios required the controlled flight of the orbiter to a runway or to allow the crew to egress individually, rather than the abort escape options on the Apollo and Soyuz space capsules.
Both the Challenger and Columbia reports explained that NASA culture had failed to keep the crew safe by not objectively evaluating the potential risks of the missions.
The Space Shuttle retirement was announced in January However, the Columbia disaster resulted in additional orbiters being prepared for launch on need in the event of a rescue mission.
As Atlantis was prepared for the final launch on need mission, the decision was made in September that it would fly as STS with a four-person crew that could remain at the ISS in the event of an emergency.
Following each orbiter's final flight, it was safed in preparation for display. The OMS and RCS systems used presented the primary dangers due to their toxic hypergolic propellant, and most of their components were permanently removed to prevent any dangerous outgassing.
The engines were removed to be used on the Space Launch System , and spare RS nozzles were attached for display purposes.
The Space Shuttle, and fictitious variants, have been featured in numerous movies. Space Camp participants as its crew.
Postal Service has released several postage issues that depict the Space Shuttle. The first such stamps were issued in , and are on display at the National Postal Museum.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Partially reusable launch system and spacecraft. Discovery lifts off at the start of STS Main article: Space Shuttle design process.
Main article: Space Shuttle orbiter. Main article: Canadarm. Main article: Spacelab. Main article: RS Main article: Space Shuttle thermal protection system.
Main article: Space Shuttle external tank. See also: Space shuttle launch countdown and Space shuttle launch commit criteria.
See also: List of Space Shuttle landing sites. Main article: Orbiter Processing Facility. Main article: Space Shuttle program.
Main article: Criticism of the Space Shuttle program. Main article: Space Shuttle retirement.
Spaceflight portal. Subsequent missions did not use the latex coating to reduce the mass, and the external tank appeared orange.
Rocket and Space Technology. November Retrieved June 21, Space stations and platforms. Orbit Book co. Retrieved April 17, The present limit on Shuttle landing payload is kg.
This value applies to payloads intended for landing. Retrieved May 4, Retrieved March 22, Retrieved June 18, Washington, D.
Dale January 1, Retrieved April 25, Somerset : Haynes Manual. Retrieved April 24, Specialty Press. Into the Black.
New York: Touchstone. Hemel Hempstead: Springer Praxis Books. Voyageur Press. Archived from the original on April 18, Retrieved December 22, The Computer History Museum.
Archived from the original on December 4, Retrieved October 25, Retrieved April 23, Archived from the original on April 6, Retrieved May 29, April 21, City of Palmdale.
July 15, KSC Release No. Retrieved May 1, Penguin Group. Retrieved September 17, July 1, Archived from the original on March 13, Retrieved April 9, Archived from the original PDF on July 21, Retrieved June 30, Release Retrieved June 10, June 6, Century of Flight.
Retrieved May 28, March 10, March 14, Aviation Week. Retrieved June 15, Soyuz vs. Falcon 9". IEEE Spectrum. Talk of the Nation. August American Film Institute.
Retrieved March 13, PC Gamer. The Space Review. Simsquared Ltd. Space Achievement Issue. Space Shuttle category.
Space Shuttle program. Space Shuttle List of missions List of crews. Challenger disaster report Columbia disaster report.
Space Shuttle missions. Space Shuttle and Buran -class orbiters. Links to related articles. Components of the International Space Station.
Category Portal. Orbital launch systems developed in the United States. Human spaceflights to the International Space Station.
List of ISS visitors crew. Astronaut Hall of Fame Space program on U. Category Commons. Orbital launch systems.
List of orbital launch systems Comparison of orbital launch systems. Angara 1. Sounding rocket Small-lift launch vehicle Medium-lift launch vehicle Heavy-lift launch vehicle Super heavy-lift launch vehicle.
Reusable launch systems.